Comments for Tech, Faltoo Fundae, and NITK ArBits http://nitklogik.wordpress.com This blog is about the happenings at NITK, freaky-visions and some tech fundae. Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:41:18 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Chetan Bhagat – The three mistakes of my life. by Laura http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2008/06/07/chetan-bhagat-the-three-mistakes-of-my-life/#comment-835 Laura Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:41:18 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-835 A shame of a writer that just drags down the whole Indian literature. He should just focus on his banking for he cannot be tagged as more than a blogger, capable of writing "funny" "interactive" lines which offer no value to their reader at the end of the day. He hasn't got a clue of what it takes to make a good writer and puts no visible effort in improving his cheapish style. A shame of a writer that just drags down the whole Indian literature. He should just focus on his banking for he cannot be tagged as more than a blogger, capable of writing “funny” “interactive” lines which offer no value to their reader at the end of the day. He hasn’t got a clue of what it takes to make a good writer and puts no visible effort in improving his cheapish style.

]]> Comment on Be there, or Be Squared? by Nair Satheesh http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/be-there-or-be-squared/#comment-753 Nair Satheesh Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:56:10 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-753 Google Squared appears to be similar to my patent application: Frankly, I am getting a Déjà vu effect while going through the “Google Squared” application because it appears to be very similar in function to my United States patent application which was filed on April 12, 2007 and as publicly disclosed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 16, 2008, when the patent application was published. My patent application is titled as “Method And System For Research Using Computer Based Simultaneous Comparison And Contrasting Of A Multiplicity Of Subjects Having Specific Attributes Within Specific Contexts” bearing Document Number “20080256023” and Inventor name “Nair Satheesh” which may be viewed at http://patft.uspto.gov/ upon Patent Applications: Quick Search. Google Squared appears to be using at least some if not many of the same methods and systems as set forth by me more than two years ago in my patent application. In fact there are many more methods and systems disclosed in my patent application which I believe will help resolve certain inaccuracies found in current Google Squared application. I have issued legal notices to Google through my Patent Attorney in the US but Google has not responded yet to any of my notices. Google Squared appears to be similar to my patent application:

Frankly, I am getting a Déjà vu effect while going through the “Google Squared” application because it appears to be very similar in function to my United States patent application which was filed on April 12, 2007 and as publicly disclosed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 16, 2008, when the patent application was published.

My patent application is titled as “Method And System For Research Using Computer Based Simultaneous Comparison And Contrasting Of A Multiplicity Of Subjects Having Specific Attributes Within Specific Contexts” bearing Document Number “20080256023” and Inventor name “Nair Satheesh” which may be viewed at http://patft.uspto.gov/ upon Patent Applications: Quick Search.

Google Squared appears to be using at least some if not many of the same methods and systems as set forth by me more than two years ago in my patent application. In fact there are many more methods and systems disclosed in my patent application which I believe will help resolve certain inaccuracies found in current Google Squared application.

I have issued legal notices to Google through my Patent Attorney in the US but Google has not responded yet to any of my notices.

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Logik http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-743 Logik Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:31:48 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-743 Oho, Kkkkaran Johar ka Swayamvar. Whate. Mahajan's swayamvar might have snorting related tasks. You never know what these creative people are smoking these days. Oho, Kkkkaran Johar ka Swayamvar. Whate.

Mahajan’s swayamvar might have snorting related tasks.
You never know what these creative people are smoking these days.

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Kitta http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-742 Kitta Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:57:31 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-742 Even Karan Johar recently said he also wanted one "Karan Ka Swayamvar". :) Even Karan Johar recently said he also wanted one “Karan Ka Swayamvar”. :)

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by wanderlust http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-738 wanderlust Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:20:56 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-738 the producers are thinking of having the same sort of show for rahul mahajan. the producers are thinking of having the same sort of show for rahul mahajan.

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by sbk http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-733 sbk Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:46:54 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-733 Ofcourse there will be a season 2 !!!! It will be called Rakhi ka divorce !!!!!! Then we can anticipate season 3 : Rakhi ka punar vivaah or Rakhi ka dwitiya swayamvar Ofcourse there will be a season 2 !!!!
It will be called Rakhi ka divorce !!!!!! Then we can anticipate season 3 : Rakhi ka punar vivaah or Rakhi ka dwitiya swayamvar

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Kitta http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-732 Kitta Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:58:23 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-732 @Pritish Nandy's tweet: No season 2. But I am sure that the other channels will definitely come up with something that will be more cornier than this one. @Pritish Nandy’s tweet:

No season 2. But I am sure that the other channels will definitely come up with something that will be more cornier than this one.

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Logik http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-729 Logik Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:48:28 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-729 Ooh. A celebrity comment :) . I'd thoroughly enjoyed your efforts of chasing after the flickr plagiarists, and shaming them in public. Nice work. Oh, ya. About my post. much thanks... regarding the doubts: Nah. 5 lakh is the approximate number of twitter users from India [ give or take a few lakhs :) ]. I mentioned that we needed about 18k people tweeting to start this trend. Almost all the calculations shown [ except for the ATPS fundae ], are of really low mathematical standards. The graph though, is accurate, and the result that I mentioned is quite evident from it. 100 ppl? I don't think so. Granted, I gave a totally worst case scenario. This study here, shows that you need around 1000 people on the average. http://news.buzzgain.com/how-many-tweets-does-it-take-to-be-a-trending-topic-on-twitter/ Ooh. A celebrity comment :) .
I’d thoroughly enjoyed your efforts of chasing after the flickr plagiarists, and shaming them in public. Nice work.

Oh, ya. About my post. much thanks…
regarding the doubts:
Nah. 5 lakh is the approximate number of twitter users from India [ give or take a few lakhs :) ].
I mentioned that we needed about 18k people tweeting to start this trend.
Almost all the calculations shown [ except for the ATPS fundae ], are of really low mathematical standards.
The graph though, is accurate, and the result that I mentioned is quite evident from it.

100 ppl? I don’t think so. Granted, I gave a totally worst case scenario.
This study here, shows that you need around 1000 people on the average.

http://news.buzzgain.com/how-many-tweets-does-it-take-to-be-a-trending-topic-on-twitter/

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Twilight fairy http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-726 Twilight fairy Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:53:20 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-726 a nice n "funny" analysis :) but something is wrong with those calculations which lead us to 500,000 ppl tweeting .. unless you are joking of course! (Have personally seen top trends from India - which needed only abt 100 ppl tweeting for let's say an hour or 2) a nice n “funny” analysis :) but something is wrong with those calculations which lead us to 500,000 ppl tweeting .. unless you are joking of course!

(Have personally seen top trends from India – which needed only abt 100 ppl tweeting for let’s say an hour or 2)

]]> Comment on How / Why did Rakhi trend – A case study by Logik http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/how-why-did-rakhi-trend-a-case-study/#comment-724 Logik Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:20:04 +0000 http://nitklogik.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-724 Yeah, the strict filter feature is totally pointless in her case. I tried that too :-) Yeah, the strict filter feature is totally pointless in her case. I tried that too :-)

]]>